ourschoolboard.org

District overview

Moreno Valley Unified School District

Budget pressure, special-education support, classroom learning and pending decisions.

An overview of CSHS
Alex · by-sa

How is Moreno Valley balancing student needs and budget pressure?

Approved budget with widening forecast gaps

The county approved Moreno Valley’s 2026–27 budget, while warning that unrestricted spending exceeds revenue in all three forecast years. The board is also pressing for better special-education services and stronger classroom learning. Fall meetings describe new community health access, a possible high-school AI study tool and an upcoming charter decision.

Attendance helps drive funding

California’s Local Control Funding Formula combines state and local funding and provides additional support for high-need students. The budget projects 27,842 average daily attendance, down 1.9%, with further declines ahead. ADA counts attendance, not enrollment.

Forecast gaps grow without adopted cuts

Annual unrestricted gaps are projected at $12.4 million, $29.7 million and $42.7 million from 2026–27 through 2028–29. The later years assume no LCFF cost-of-living increase. The county still projects positive fund balances, minimum reserves and sufficient cash.

An elected board sets the plan

Five elected trustees adopt district policies and budgets and oversee the superintendent. Student board representatives also speak at meetings. The November 10 and December 15 public sessions are scheduled for 5 p.m. at Moreno Valley High School’s Performing Arts Center.

Supports exist, while access and outcomes need attention

The county describes ten district social workers, elementary counseling, attendance specialists and home visits. Fall meetings surface concerns about special-education class sizes, support staff and IEP follow-through. The district is preparing an outside study proposal rather than reporting a completed audit.

Operating deficits do not establish insolvency. Concerns raised in public comments are not verified misconduct findings, and proposed studies or pilots are not adopted services.

Where the district stands

Enrollment in county achievement tableverified
30,926 students, 2025

County-reproduced Dashboard snapshot; not current enrollment.

Projected average daily attendanceverified
27,842 ADA, 2026–27

Down 1.9% from certified 2025–26 P-2 ADA; further declines projected in the following two years.

Chronic absenteeismverified
25.8 %, 2025

Later preliminary reports use different periods; this is the county’s published 2025 snapshot.

Graduation rateverified
93.3 %, 2025

Different measure from college/career readiness.

College/career indicatorverified
46.1 %, 2025

County also recognizes AP, IB, dual enrollment, AVID and 27 CTE pathways.

Projected unrestricted operating gapverified
12.4 million dollars, 2026–27

Forecast rises to $29.7 million in 2027–28 and $42.7 million in 2028–29. This is annual deficit spending, not a negative ending balance.

Major projects

Special-education review and improvement

Outside study proposed; board approval still needed

Officials are preparing a comprehensive School Services of California study of instruction, staffing, ratios, contracts, costs and IEP practices. Staff estimate $99,000–$150,000, with the provider unavailable before March 2027. Trustees and educators are also seeking smaller classes, additional instructional assistants and protected support time. No new class-size limit was adopted in these meetings.

Next: Review the study proposal, December funding detail and any concrete changes to class sizes, staffing or IEP service delivery.
  1. Parents and trustees raised service-access concerns; officials said they would follow up.
  2. Staff described the outside study proposal, cost range and earliest provider availability.
  3. Officials plan special-education funding detail within December’s first interim report; check the posted agenda.

Funding

District resources; a final study contract, funding allocation and any staffing changes were not approved in the collected records.

Stronger classroom instruction and student support

Implementation continues; results vary by school and subject

Principals describe mixed achievement: some readiness and English-learner progress gains, but persistent mathematics gaps and reading declines at several schools. Work includes common assessments, small-group instruction, teacher coaching, restorative practices and counseling. Staff propose a Google AI study-tool pilot for high schools while keeping K–8 access blocked; launch was not established.

Next: Check the midyear assessment update and any formal AI-policy or pilot decision; do not assume a launch from the presentation.
  1. Study session reviewed preliminary outcomes and a proposed high-school AI study-tool pilot.
  2. Middle-school principals described math gaps and school-level interventions.
  3. Elementary principals described reading needs, targeted support and planned benchmark follow-up.

Funding

District instructional and student-support resources; the September presenter said the proposed AI tool is included in the existing Google arrangement, but a contract price was not independently verified.

Options for Youth local charter petition

Staff recommend denial; decision pending

The existing Moreno Valley resource center seeks local charter authorization for 2027–28 onward. Staff recommend denial, citing program, governance and financial concerns. Families and students supported the program at the October hearing.

Next: Read the November 10 decision and any revised terms. The recommendation is not a closure order.
  1. District received the petition.
  2. Board held the initial public hearing.
  3. Staff published a denial recommendation.
  4. Board hearing and action scheduled.

Funding

Proposed charter public funding; final authorization and budget arrangements remain undecided.

Local elections & school board members

Elections & votes

Board electionScheduled

November 3, 2026 board election—Trustee Area 3

Moreno Valley Unified School District

The county’s final candidate list marks the Trustee Area 3 election ON BALLOT for November 3, 2026. Qualified candidates: Justin Jackson, Martha Ruiz, Jennifer Grisham. No result is established by this filing record.

Official source · verified Nov 3, 2026

Board electionScheduled

November 3, 2026 board election—Trustee Area 4

Moreno Valley Unified School District

The county’s final candidate list marks the Trustee Area 4 election ON BALLOT for November 3, 2026. Qualified candidates: Kristina Horta, Maria Lozano, Brandy Clark, Ed Robillard. No result is established by this filing record.

Official source · verified Nov 3, 2026

School board members

Recent news

View the news feed →

Resources

Practical guides to school phone policies, district budgets, and administrator hiring.

Explore resources →

Reviewed all six collected official sources in full. Native chronological review covered all three meeting transcripts, the short phone explainer, the seven-page county letter and the 23-page charter staff report; financial and achievement tables were visually checked. Proposals, official decisions, staff findings and public claims are distinguished.

Get alerts for Moreno Valley Unified School District

We read every agenda, packet, recording, and set of minutes, and write up the decisions that affect families — each one linked to the document it came from.

Copy the RSS link into your feed reader to get new published alerts.